Category — Liberals

New England at end of tether, Texas sane

North Texas school district will let teachers carry guns

HARROLD, Texas — A tiny Texas school district may be the first in the nation to allow teachers and staff to pack guns for protection when classes begin later this month, a newspaper reported.

Trustees at the Harrold Independent School District approved a district policy change last October so employees can carry concealed firearms to deter and protect against school shootings, provided the gun-toting teachers follow certain requirements.

In order for teachers and staff to carry a pistol, they must have a Texas license to carry a concealed handgun; must be authorized to carry by the district; must receive training in crisis management and hostile situations and have to use ammunition that is designed to minimize the risk of ricochet in school halls.

Superintendent David Thweatt said the small community is a 30-minute drive from the sheriff’s office, leaving students and teachers without protection. He said the district’s lone campus sits 500 feet from heavily trafficked U.S. 287, which could make it a target.

“When the federal government started making schools gun-free zones, that’s when all of these shootings started. (emphasis added) [snip]

Harrold Independent School District, http://harroldisd.net/

Doesn’t this sound as if the district had a bowl of smarts for breakfast. This school now moves to the list of places that are very very low on the shoot-em-up list: gun stores, shooting ranges, police stations and my house.

…government started making schools gun-free zones… Yeah, sacrifice a few kids, then start screaming for gun control. More kids shot, start frothing at the mouth, the moonbat pols join in the fray. No means to an end is too extreme; ask Putin, Soros or Kos. Logic never rules an argument on that side.

First on Drudge on Aug 15th, let us see if the MSM reports this anywhere.

Archived in: , , , ,

August 16, 2008 at 7:55 am   2 Comments

Beacon Hill Seeks Gay Marriage Windfall Profits

Governor Patrick and his Beacon Hill cronies were all grins last week.  They repealed the 1913 law that kept out-of-state gay couples from marrying here.  The governor says it’s a blow for equality, but this Globe editorial quickly points out that our solons are looking for some gay marriage “windfall” profits too.

The combination of the 1913 law and recent California decision enabling gay marriage were going to cost the state economically.  But happy days are here again because now the state can look forward to an estimated $111 million over the next 3 years.

Nothing gets Beacon Hill moving like a new opportunity to fleece the people.

Archived in: , , ,

August 3, 2008 at 6:40 pm   7 Comments

Please secede, please

The Middlebury Institute has promoted Vermont secession. Nothing they have provided shows a grasp of the intricacies faced in this process even if it passed.
Today, Vermont is a cassava root ahead of being a Third World Nation; if not for the earmarks dragged in by Sen. Leahy, it would be one.

These numbers below are probably close, given the level of education in this country.

Secession, Ignorance, and Stupidity:

A recent Zogby/Middlebury Institute poll shows that 22% of Americans believe that “any state or region has the right to peaceably secede and become an independent republic.” Belief in states’ and regions right to secede was especially common among blacks (40%), Hispanics (43%) and people aged 18-24 (40%). Interestingly, Political liberals (32%) were more likely to believe in a right to secession than conservatives (17%). 18% of respondents say they would support a secession movement in their own state, including 24% of southerners.

Constitutional law professor Ann Althouse claims that these poll results show that “all these people [who believe in a right to secession] have the law wrong and don’t seem to know the basics of the history of the Civil War.” She concludes that the pro-secession survey respondents are “fascinatingly stupid.” [snip]

I certainly agree with Ann that much of the public is shockingly ignorant about American history and constitutional law. This is one aspect of the more general widespread political ignorance that I have often written about on this blog and elsewhere (e.g. here and here). At the same time, I don’t think that ignorance is necessarily a sign of stupidity. [snip]

I agree with Althouse, fascinatingly stupid is a mild term however. I think the largest majority of them are clueless to what will be in order.
Unlike Althouse, I would encourage them to secede while they still know everything. And once out they cannot return. Citizenship is revoked.

First lets look at the demographics and their political suasion (this is important): from above

  • Blacks–40%
  • Hispanics–43%
  • 18 to 24–40%
  • Political liberals–32%
  • Conservatives–17%

There are two groups, which I suspect fit in the prior numbers but listed separately:

  • Own state respondents–18%
  • Southerners–24%

The odds are good that each group has their own ideas as to how and where to form their country. This may cause some discombobulation in some areas for an unknown duration. For the sake of this discussion, all is amicable; selection and agreement is with minimal delay. People leave who wish to and others arrive all done equitably.

Government

With your own country, you need to form a government and some form of document of guidance. This will be by ballot or bullet. Given the liberal’s past history and for that matter most of the world, I’ll let you guess which method forms the ruling body.

Monetary system

Every country needs to have a means of settling internal debts, trade on the world markets and negotiate as something other than a third world nation. Or did these secessionists think they would use Sam’s money? It doesn’t work that way; you are a sovereign nation, act as one. All we have to do is change the color of the currency, declare the old valueless and issue the new in our banks. Don’t be stupid and think the Government hasn’t all ready printed the necessary notes. Those from the military remember MPC’s being changed to shut down black markets overnight.

Infrastructure

Roadways, airports, hospitals and rail lines are in place. All the new country needs is to equip and staff the existing structures and maintain them. Who says the professionals doing this work now are going to stay there. How will they be paid, housed, fed?
Forget keeping the National Guard equipment, guardsmen stay if they wish, but they are no longer paid nor receive any federal benefits if they do. Why should they, now they are foreign troops.

Business and Industry

Whether you have any industry and business depends on the tax structure. The tax structure depends on the country’s monetary system. If you cannot pay the employees in something other than rubles, your industry moves. No industry, what do you trade for things you need?

Basic services

Most of the listed above believe they will get the same basic services they get now: socialized medicine, welfare, WIC, food stamps, public schools Section 8 housing, police, fire and emergency response and working telephones. Yeah, think about that, working phones,

I encourage the above groups to opt for nationhood; pure emotion drives it and it drives it right into the Swamp of Stupidity.

If this should happen, we need to know who occupies what areas. All borders with new nations are fortified like the Korean 38th parallel until and if treaties are negotiated.

(Political liberals)
New EnglandThe Democratic Republic of Gated Communities (Might contain NYC, Long Island and NJ)
Who will mow the lawns and plow the snow, I haven’t an idea. After seeing what happened in South Africa, nobody but the swells will live there. That is all ready graven in liberal stone.

(18 to 24)

Southern CA—High Kingdom of Surf
Dude, like it will be soooo tomorrow and full of tatts.
It will be until we shut off the water for non-payment and shut off the power so they can conserve to their heart’s content.

(Hispanics)
Florida—Sovereign State of Sunny Sombrero
They can mow lawns, pick oranges and smuggle illegals to surfeit.

(Blacks)
Louisiana—Chocklit Empire
With Chief Nagin as the Wonka Man and Jesse “Fillin’ Man” Jackson as Minister of Appointees with Al ‘Mouth’ Sharpton as Minister of Graffiti, a government with portfolio is formed. This former state, having been run by liberals and Donks for years won’t know the difference except there won’t be any money.

(Conservatives)
I haven’t a clue who these individuals are. Guessing says Bible people so
Del Rio, Texas.
If that is wrong, then the panhandle of Idaho. They’ll all fit and you’ll never see them again.

Archived in: , , ,

July 27, 2008 at 5:08 pm   9 Comments

Mr. MotO Misreads Cold War

Former US ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton makes a great point in his Op Ed today—Mr. MotO doesn’t understand the lessons of the Cold War. Unlike his “we’re citizens of the World” speech implies, the Cold War was won through steely resolve—a resolve that many on the left and Western Europe did not share. If we’d joined the pacifists and socialists at the time, we’d be propping up Eastern Bloc countries with economic aid just like North Korea today. And tens of millions would still be suffering inside totalitarian states.

Let’s hope Mr. MotO was pandering to the crowd. It’s naïve to think the world will embrace, and there’ll be no more need for US leadership.

Archived in: , , , , , ,

July 26, 2008 at 1:10 pm   3 Comments

McCain’s Chickens Come Home to Roost

John McCain spent most of his career bashing conservatives, cultivating media “friendships”, and celebrating his maverick image.  Therefore, the NY Times rejection of his Op Ed because it’s not “Obamaish” is just laced with bitter irony.  However, I’d be curious to know how many rewrites Obama did on his piece before it was accepted.  Truth be told, and as clearly implied by the Times response that Obama’s piece just “worked” for them, they treat every utterance by Obama like he’s giving the Sermon on the Mount.

When it’s all said and done, I wonder if the wedge McCain drove between himself and the base for media approbation will pay off?  I’m skeptical that he’ll get more independents and liberals than the conservatives he turned off with his “maverick” ways.

Archived in: , , , , , , , ,

July 21, 2008 at 10:39 pm   4 Comments

The ultimate disgrace

One can give up many things and suffer mildly.

lament.jpg

Truly a horrible affliction!

Archived in:

June 17, 2008 at 6:10 pm   3 Comments

Johnny Come Lately Gore Endorses Obama

They say that even the blind squirrel can find a nut. Illustrating that axiom is Al Gore’s endorsement of the only remaining candidate in the Democratic presidential race today. I’m sure that Barack Obama was sitting on the edge of his seat wondering who Al might select. Hint: It was going to be the Democrat.

Al says Barack is “clearly the candidate best able to solve these problems and bring change to America.” What kind of change we aren’t sure. What problems he’s solved before nobody knows. But Al wants you to pull the straight Democratic ticket without thinking about those things. Too bad Al never finished that law degree because Barack might have appointed him to the Supreme Court for that cogent and timely endorsement.

Archived in: , , , , ,

June 16, 2008 at 10:19 pm   3 Comments

When Dems End Energy Obstructionism, They Can Party Like It’s 1999

If you have any money left after filling your gas tank, you can donate to the Democratic convention in Denver.  But before you buy Democrats champagne bottles and bacon wrapped scallops, ask yourself why they won’t let us build nuclear power plants, drill for offshore oil, build more refineries, or drill in ANWAR.  Hell, I’d donate $25 if they’d end their obstructionism toward sensible intermediate energy policies.

And don’t talk to me about alternative energy sources.  That’s the long-term policy.  Why aren’t Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi doing anything in the short to intermediate terms to alleviate the energy crunch?  Those “big hearted” liberals won’t even back a gas tax holiday.  Since they aren’t lifting a finger to address our energy needs, they’ll live with 1 big party in Denver.

Archived in: , , , , , ,

June 16, 2008 at 7:54 pm   Comments Off

Good bye Susan, we’ll not miss you

 I don’t think one can get more boring and drear than Liz Smith unless one is listening to the actual persons about whom she writes. Which means you don’t have a life.

SUSAN SARANDON, who appeared in three films last year and won kudos for her TV movie “Bernard and Doris,” is still not a contented soul. She says if John McCain gets elected, she will move to Italy or Canada. She adds, “It’s a critical time, but I have faith in the American people.”

OK, American people. You don’t want Susan to move out of the country, so it’s up to you to elect Barack Obama. What? You thought Susan of all people would be for Hillary Clinton? Well, no. She told John Hiscock: “I thought the whole point of feminism is that you’re not supposed to be defined by gender. I don’t understand the reasoning behind that, because I wouldn’t vote for Condoleezza Rice, and I hated Margaret Thatcher.”

Alec Baldwin, Robert Redford and a couple of other clowns were going to move out of the US if Bush was re-elected. He was, they didn’t. That was disappointing in the extremis. Redford did move to Vermont which counts for something I guess.

Why cannot these mentally indigent personages keep their word?

Archived in: , , ,

May 30, 2008 at 8:04 pm   5 Comments

Obama’s Paltry Charitable Gifts

If Barack Obama is going to talk the talk:

The Class of 2008 did not need to “do something crazy like run for president,” Obama said, but the graduates should look beyond “the big house and the nice suits and all the other things that our money culture says you should buy.”

He might want to consider walking the walk:

It looks like Barack can buy plenty of nice suits. Shame he apparently didn’t take his own advice and donate a few of them.

Archived in: , , , ,

May 27, 2008 at 10:18 pm   2 Comments