Makes sense!

Liberals are kind of dense!

With the big push on for health care, one must take every precaution available.
Furthermore, choose the most efficacious prophylactic the market guarantees.

Pick one that cannot break, requires no batteries and fits in one hand.

Sotomayor is not a 2^nd Amendment believer. Neither is Obama or Holder. However they’re safe, guarded, well protected.

Do you think they care about you?

Second Amendment
Adopted in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment reads in its entirety:
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
That’s it. Anyone see anything about bayonet lugs, crew served weapons, trailer hitches calibers, barrel lengths, number or size of shot, how about types of weapons such tomahawks, clubs, knives, swords or any type of concealed weapons.
Fine, where do this clown get off telling anyone what they can have or carry on or about their person.

Chicago Law Banning Handguns in City Upheld by Court

A Chicago ordinance banning handguns and automatic weapons within city limits was upheld by a U.S. Court of Appeals panel, which rejected a challenge by the National Rifle Association.
The unanimous three-judge panel ruled today that a U.S. Supreme Court decision last year, which recognized an individual right to bear arms under the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment, didn’t apply to states and municipalities.

“The Supreme Court has rebuffed requests to apply the second amendment to the states,” U.S. Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook wrote, upholding lower court decisions last year to throw out suits against Chicago and its suburb of Oak Park, Illinois.
The Fairfax, Virginia-based NRA sued the municipalities in June 2008, one day after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller struck down a hand-gun ban in the U.S. capital district encompassing Washington.

“We clearly disagree with the court’s conclusion,” NRA attorney William N. Howard, a partner in Chicago’s Freeborn & Peters LLP, said in a telephone interview. “The next step will be an appeal to the Supreme Court.”
“We recognize that this may not be the end of this litigation,” Jenny Hoyle, a spokeswoman for the city of Chicago’s law department said, acknowledging the likelihood the NRA would seek further review. “We’re certainly prepared for that if this happens. We’re prepared to aggressively defend our ordinance.” [snip]

The DoJ had a solid case against the Black Panthers for voter intimidation and weapons violations last November in Philadelphia. The career lawyers at DoJ were at the sentencing stage when DoJ dropped the case causing the dismissal of charges.

Who dropped the case? Who is the AG? Eric Holder, who took an oath to uphold the law as written, not as he likes it. You might as well ask who is his boss.

On the other hand, he and his leash holder hace no use for the 2^nd Amendment. The following list of experts agree that GUN CONTROL works. You’ll recognize these famous and important personages:

Quite an august bunch, is it not?

This is an excellent example of gun control.

Gotta admire the man for doing the good job.
Florida’s got it right.

Some ‘dirtbag’ in Polk County Florida who got pulled over in a routine traffic stop ended up ‘executing’ the deputy who stopped him. The deputy was shot eight times, including once behind his right ear at close range. Another deputy was wounded and a police dog killed. A statewide manhunt ensued.

The low-life was found hiding in a wooded area with his gun. SWAT team officers fired and hit the jerkoff 68 times.

Now here’s the kicker:

Some dumbass in the media asked why they shot him 68 times. Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd, told the Orlando Sentinel: “That’s all the bullets we had!” (Talk about an all-time classic answer!)

Justice Served. Bullets are much cheaper than “40″ years of meals, cable TV, appeals and civil rights. And it made another cell available!
$36.72 ammo costs versus 40years @$40,000/year =$1,400,000 plus appeals and having to listen to the civil rights crap from the bleeding hearts.

Talk about a saving to the taxpayer.

Go ahead, stick a sign on YOUR front door: “Gun Free Zone!”

Let’s All Surrender Our Weapons — You First!
by Ann Coulter

The rash of recent shooting incidents has led people who wouldn’t know an AK-47 from a paintball gun to issue demands for more restrictions on guns. To be sure, it’s hard to find any factor in these shootings that could be responsible — other than the gun.

So far, this year’s public multiple shootings were committed by:

– Richard Poplawski, 23, product of a broken family, expelled from high school and dishonorably discharged from the Marines, who killed three policemen in Pittsburgh.

– Former crack addict Jiverly Wong, 41, who told co-workers “America sucks” yet somehow was not offered a job as a speechwriter for Barack Obama, who blockaded his victims in a civic center in Binghamton, N.Y., and shot as many people as he could, before killing himself.

– Robert Stewart, 45, a three-time divorcee and high school dropout with “violent tendencies” — according to one of his ex-wives — who shot up the nursing home in Carthage, N.C., where his newly estranged wife worked.

– Lovelle Mixon, 26, a paroled felon, struggling to get his life back on track by pimping, who shot four cops in Oakland, Calif. — before eventually being shot himself.

– Twenty-eight-year-old Michael McLendon, child of divorce, living with his mother and boycotting family funerals because he hated his relatives, who killed 10 of those relatives and their neighbors in Samson, Ala.

It might make more sense to outlaw men than guns. Or divorce. Or crack. Or to prohibit felons from having guns. Except we already outlaw crack and felons owning guns and yet still, somehow, Wong got crack and Mixon got a gun.

After being pulled over for a routine traffic violation, Lovelle Mixon did exactly what they teach in driver’s ed by immediately shooting four cops. Mixon’s supporters held a posthumous rally in his honor, claiming he shot the cops only in “self-defense,” which I take it includes the cop Mixon shot while the officer was lying on the ground.

I guess Mixon also raped that 12-year-old girl in “self-defense.” Clearly, the pimping industry has lost a good man. I wish I’d known him. I tip my green velvet fedora with the dollar signs all over it to him. Why do the good ones always die young? Pimps, I mean.

Liberals tolerate rallies on behalf of cop-killers, but they prohibit law-abiding citizens working at community centers in Binghamton, N.Y., from being armed to defend themselves from disturbed, crack-addicted America-haters like Jiverly Wong.

It’s something in liberals’ DNA: They think they can pass a law eliminating guns and nuclear weapons, but teenagers having sex is completely beyond our control.

The demand for more gun control in response to any crime involving a gun is exactly like Obama’s response to North Korea’s openly belligerent act of launching a long-range missile this week: Obama leapt to action by calling for worldwide nuclear disarmament.

If the SAT test were used to determine how stupid a liberal is, one question would be: “The best defense against lawless rogues who possess _______ is for law-abiding individuals to surrender their own _______________.”
Correct answer: Guns. We would also have accepted nuclear weapons.

Obama explained that “the United States has a moral responsibility” to lead disarmament efforts because America is “the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon.”

So don’t go feeling all morally superior to a country whose business model consists of exporting heroin, nuclear bombs and counterfeit U.S. dollars, and of importing Swedish prostitutes, you yahoo Americans with your little flag lapel pins.

On the other hand, the Japanese haven’t acted up much in the last, say, 64 years …

Fortunately, our sailors didn’t wait around for Obama to save them when Somali pirates boarded their ship this week. Stop right now or I’ll ask the U.N. to remind the “international community” that “the U.S. is not at war with Somali pirates.”

Gun-toting Americans are clearly more self-sufficient than the sissy Europeans. This is great news for everyone except Barney Frank, who’s always secretly wondered what it would be like to be taken by a Somali pirate.

Police — whom I gather liberals intend to continue having guns — and intrepid U.N. resolution drafters can’t be everywhere, all the time.

If a single civilian in that Binghamton community center had been armed, instead of 14 dead, there might have only been one or two — including the shooter. In the end, the cops didn’t stop Wong. His killing spree ended only when he decided to stop, and he killed himself.

“The shooter will eventually run out of ammo” strategy may not be the best one for stopping deranged multiple murderers.

But it’s highly unlikely that any community center in the entire state would be safe from a disturbed former crack-addict like Wong because New York’s restrictive gun laws require a citizen to prove he has a need for a gun to obtain a concealed carry permit.

Instead of having Planned Parenthood distribute condoms in schools, they ought get the NRA to pass out revolvers. It would save more lives.

Sarah Brady warned that concealed carry would lead to a “”Wild West” scene in the streets. Liberals wailed about the potential loss of life and danger of guns in the hands of armed citizens.
Liberals actually worry about the elimination of the wrong person, that would be the perp. You’ve heard all the weepy crap.

Here’s one happy result.

Robber fatally shot in Miami Burger King holdup

A robbery at a Burger King in Miami’s Upper East Side neighborhood left one person dead and another seriously injured.

An afternoon shootout at a busy Burger King restaurant in Miami left a potential robber dead and the customer who shot him seriously wounded.
The bloody event unfolded about 4 p.m. Tuesday at the restaurant at Northeast 54th Street and Biscayne Boulevard. It was a time, employees said, when it is usually crowded with schoolchildren and people getting out of work early.
The robber entered wearing a ski mask. He approached a clerk, showed his gun and demanded money, said Miami police spokesman Jeff Giordano.
A customer eyed him and the two started arguing. The customer had a concealed-weapons permit and his gun — and the two exchanged gunfire.
The robber crumpled to the floor and was pronounced dead at the scene. [snip]

The only bit of stupidity I can find is the citizen argued with the perp. Two rounds in the hat and the citizen wouldn’t have received return fire, hence been wounded. Furthermore, he wouldn’t have endangered others in the restaurant with the errant gunfire by the dirtbag.

The scorecard reads: Concealed Carry—1, Gun Grabbers–0.
A previous post to this subject here at NER.

Now the wounded citizen needs to file a huge civil suit against the perp’s family and estate. Whether they have anything or not is immaterial; one can hope threats of retribution might force families to shoot the bastards before they commit crimes again.
I doubt this was the first trip down this illicit road. No matter, it was his last!

The only thing one bestows on Liberals is the back of the hand!

The Brits learned, far too late.There is a lesson for us.
Crush this imbecilic thinking of negotiating with liberals. You cannot!
View the video. It should make you angry. (You might want to shoot the pipers) It should cause some fear too.

This is their planned future for you!

Do You Now Own, or Have You Ever Owned, a Gun?

The Politico reports on a curious addition to the Obama transition personnel questionnaire for potential appointees to the new Administration.
Tucked in at the end of the questionnaire and listed under “Miscellaneous,” it reads: “Do you or any members of your immediate family own a gun? If so, provide complete ownership and registration information. Has the registration ever lapsed? Please also describe how and by whom it is used and whether it has been the cause of any personal injuries or property damage.”

The answer to these questions should be “None of your business.” “Ditto.” “N/A” and “N/A”

Most people don’t live in liberal fascist cesspools like NY and Chicago, where everything they do that is not PC, requires registration and governmental approval.

Paul Light, professor of public service at New York University, said there was no such question for potential appointees when President George W. Bush took office in 2000. (emphasis added)
“It kind of sticks out there like a sore thumb,” Light said.
He expressed uncertainty over why it was included but surmised it was out of an abundance of caution, a desire to avoid the spectacle of a Cabinet-level or other high-ranking appointee who is discovered to have an unregistered handgun at home.
“It’s the kind of thing that, if dug out, could be an embarrassment to the president-elect,” Light said.

Just who would discover they have an unregistered handgun? The local police certainly won’t be checking. Makes one wonder what kind of PC check this is, since registration is not a mandatory federal condition YET.

This person has the reason. If you believe in gun control you’ll be on his side.

This is what Obama  believes. He said it; he voted this way and he’ll do it again.

 How the 2^nd Amendment works as seen on this preview of “Boston Legal”

http://www.tv.com/video/15055/dances-with-wolves?o=tv&tag=show_summary;video;thumb

You may have to copy and paste this into your browser.

And you said Shatner can’t act!

Ed G. Mann has this post on Fashions for the Obama Presidency. He doesn’t say it in those words but given Obama’s loathing for the 2ndAmendment…

In Mexico, shopping for the right thing to wear at the wrong end of a gun

[snip]
Some people are trying to get their hands on weapons, which are tightly regulated here but widely available on the black market. To some, bulletproof fashion is the logical next step. [snip]

He points out that the clothing is not designed for the kind of warfare that is breaking out in some parts of Mexico, where drug assassins have used rocket launchers and grenades to wipe out rivals. [snip]

Mann writes:
Of course, even in a bastion of democracy like Mexico, gun control keeps weapons out of the hands of the truly malignant: i.e. the cancerous law abiding. It always works so well.

If the haberdasher cannot guarantee safety against RPG’s and grenades, I should probably request a refund. At least use put the expense on your credit card so your estate can contest the charge.

North Texas school district will let teachers carry guns

HARROLD, Texas — A tiny Texas school district may be the first in the nation to allow teachers and staff to pack guns for protection when classes begin later this month, a newspaper reported.

Trustees at the Harrold Independent School District approved a district policy change last October so employees can carry concealed firearms to deter and protect against school shootings, provided the gun-toting teachers follow certain requirements.

In order for teachers and staff to carry a pistol, they must have a Texas license to carry a concealed handgun; must be authorized to carry by the district; must receive training in crisis management and hostile situations and have to use ammunition that is designed to minimize the risk of ricochet in school halls.

Superintendent David Thweatt said the small community is a 30-minute drive from the sheriff’s office, leaving students and teachers without protection. He said the district’s lone campus sits 500 feet from heavily trafficked U.S. 287, which could make it a target.

“When the federal government started making schools gun-free zones, that’s when all of these shootings started. (emphasis added) [snip]

Harrold Independent School District, http://harroldisd.net/

Doesn’t this sound as if the district had a bowl of smarts for breakfast. This school now moves to the list of places that are very very low on the shoot-em-up list: gun stores, shooting ranges, police stations and my house.

…government started making schools gun-free zones… Yeah, sacrifice a few kids, then start screaming for gun control. More kids shot, start frothing at the mouth, the moonbat pols join in the fray. No means to an end is too extreme; ask Putin, Soros or Kos. Logic never rules an argument on that side.

First on Drudge on Aug 15^th, let us see if the MSM reports this anywhere.

The Canadian Human Rights Commission will have to look at the facts to see if the perp is:

Knife-wielding man beheads fellow passenger on bus

A passenger traveling on a bus across Canada’s vast Western plains stabbed, gutted and decapitated a man seated next to him in an unexplained attack, a witness told media Thursday.

The victim had been sleeping before he was repeatedly stabbed in the chest by a man with a large knife, witness Garnet Caton told public broadcaster CBC.

If the victim is not Muslim, the Commission must determine is he dreamed an infidel thought besmirching the Prophet. You know of course, in Canada, mere thought is punishable by fines and public scourging, ask Mark Steyn. Beheading is however a bit stronger than a fine.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police said they were investigating a “major incident” that occurred at 9 pm Wednesday (0200 GMT Thursday) on a Greyhound bus traveling eastbound from Edmonton to Winnipeg, but offered no details.

Makes one glad the Canadians have strong gun control laws. Uh Oh, just like England, they’re using BIG knives. How civilized of them.

Glad too this is only a major incident, but what constitutes a horrible incident?