Washington Post Admits Obama Bias
It’s a bit late to be admitting that you rigged election coverage for Barack Obama, but I guess confession is good for the soul:
The Post provided a lot of good campaign coverage, but readers have been consistently critical of the lack of probing issues coverage and what they saw as a tilt toward Democrat Barack Obama. My surveys, which ended on Election Day, show that they are right on both counts.
Not only did they tilt the news to favor Obama, they ignored the issues. Where was this introspection during the election when they had a duty to inform the voters? I almost wish I had a Washington Post subscription so I could cancel it.
Archived in: Barack Obama, Media Bias, President-elect Barack ObamaNovember 11, 2008 at 5:17 pm | Trackback












1 comment
I posted this article somewhere here before but I’ll do it again here since it’s relevant. It’s sad that of the entire national media, only one guy had the guts to blow the whistle on the blatant media bias this past election: http://abcnews.go.com/Business.....amp;page=1