Obama’s Path to Marxist Power
Here’s must listen audio of Barack Obama discussing the Warren Court, wealth redistribution, and the civil rights movement:
In the audio, Obama says one of the “tragedies”, his words mind you, of the civil rights movement was its focus on the courts. The courts couldn’t “break free from the essential constraints placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution” against redistribution of wealth. Obama goes on to say it’s just as well though since people are less accepting of court mandated change anyway. So how does he forsee this redistributive action taking place? Through community organizing and forming coalitions of power that can enact it through the legislative process.
Is anybody else connecting the dots out there? Obama’s far left-wing associations (ACORN, Ayers, and Wright), which the media insists aren’t relevant, clearly aren’t accidental. They play a vital role in the strategy that vaulted him into power. Now he’s in position to form a coalition with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to do legislatively what the courts wouldn’t. It’s no accident that congressional Democrats are discussing the seizure of private assets in 401Ks. They know what Joe the Plumber knows–Obama is a Marxist.
There’s only one problem for Obama though–America is still a center, right nation. Americans overwhelmingly reject wealth redistribution in favor of job creation and improving the overall economy by huge margins (84% to 13%). I just hope people wake up in time to avert this disaster.
Update: Here’s McCain on Barack the “Redistributor”. Best line: “…He’s more interested in controlling wealth than creating it….in redistributing money instead of spreading opportunity…”
Archived in: 2008 Election, ACORN, Ayers, Barack Obama, Congress, Democrats, Economy, Harry Reid, Marxism, Nancy Pelosi, Presidential ElectionOctober 27, 2008 at 7:20 pm | Trackback
16 comments
10-28-08
Beijing, China
Unassociated Fictional Press
The Government of The Peoples Republic of China has unanimously
endorsed McCain/Palin for President of the United States.
“They are our kind of leaders!” says a Government spokesperson.
“They understand that business and the government should be in control,
not the silly workers, or ‘people’ as they sometimes call themselves.
Also, we understand the Republic concept. It is Democracy we find
distasteful.”
A leading General, who wished to remain anonymous, had this to say
about President McCain: “We planted many post-hypnotic suggestions
in our former P.O.W.’s mind and we are beside ourselves with
anticipation at having the opportunity to trigger them and have control
of the white house without even having to wage a war…”
“And if that fails,” a second anonymous official pipes in “it’s not like
George W. Bush did not already sell it to us anyway.”
P.S. We sure hope that Sarah Palin and her corrupt comrade Ted Stevens dream of
a free Alaska comes true someday so we can do serious business.
Tito The Savant:
Tito, your intentions are waaayyyy beyond your talents. First, you need to be a writer of minimum ability, and a thinker above the gnat-level to pull this kind of thing off.
Stick to computer games and stealing compositions from the other charity-admissions frosh. You can erase their names and add your own, and eventually find a job in the fast-food industry.
Seriously Hotspur, that was sooooo mean spirited! It isn’t nice to make fun of the disabled.
I’ve been dead-heading the geraniums we brought inside last week. What’s one more?
Uh oh, I found a jumping spider on one of those geraniums. Look! It’s trying to speak! I think I’ll call it Tito!
I can’t resist…
Tito’s second paragraph is spectacular. The use of “says” instead of “said” is truly exceptional syntax. Then, if “they” (which in this case refers to whom?) sometimes call themselves “people”, what do they call themselves at other times? Next there’s some deeply immaterial crap about Republic and Democracy which proves that Tito got a pamphlet on his last Props ‘n Paints trip to DC.
Paragraph Three really comes into its full one-inchViagra-enhanced stature when Paragraph Four clarifies that Bush sold the Chinese a war, or post-hypnotic suggestions, or something else. Who knows? Tito The Builder can’t build a coherent thought.
Paragraph Five is a gem. The word “dream” is used as a verb where it’s meant to be a noun, although the possessors of the dream are not entitled to the possessive. Amazing, Tito. Did you get peanut butter in your ears on the day they taught this stuff?
I thought Tito was a freshmen. Apparently he’s a bat-shi* crazy PhD, who gets the NER Moron Ribbon for 2008 and thereafter.
A typical cut and paste from some 101 poly sci screed that should have been deleted. Obviously written by a ejectee of our public school system.
Stunning to hear Obama’s reference to “negative rights” and his frustration at failing to circumvent Constitutional parameters…
This is how a liberal logic thread starts, with a basic inversion which then travels 180 degrees away…in this case from the Constitution…this thread will develop as a discussion of the “rights” (of government) rather than the limited rights (of the individual American.)
Feeling queasy? It’s your instinct, baby…
Obama’s claim that the Constitution is a charter of negative rights is correct, but his remark is not bright or informative or learned. Negative rights are enjoyed through inaction or prohibitions on the part of someone else, or some authority. Positive rights are enjoyed through the required action of someone/something else. Progressives have wanted Constitutional positive rights for a hundred years or more; not just legislative advantages or benefits, but REQUIREMENTS.
Helen’s correct. The rights of government already exist through defined and implied powers…give govt more power and it acquires more rights.
I think Tito has a promising career in some Higher School of Lower Education’s Sociology or Education department ahead of him once he puts down the bong and moves out of the basement.
What’s he gonna do with his full-size AC-DC models?
As soon as he figures out which way he bends, he’ll engage in coitus with them.
I’m contacting the authorities about you, Mann. You’re about to be redistributed.
Tut tut Sir, not I, for I am above reproach. It is my ordained position in life to pass such judgments on those undignified as Tito the Builder.
Anyone ever read this from the Washington post.Is this guy really an American??Is this the type of man you want to represent the United States Of America,No Way!!!!!!
—– Original Message —–
Subject: FW: Article from Washington Post
——————————————————————————–
——————————————————————————–
Subject: FW: Article from Washington Post
——————————————————————————–
Subject: From the Washington
MY God! I hope every one is listening, before it is to late.
Perhaps there are SOME out there who are beginning to get ‘the picture’. The following is a narrative taken from Sunday Morning’s televised ‘Meet The Press’, and the author is employed by none other than the Washington Post!! Yeah……the Washington Post of New York and Los Angeles Times fame!! Must say that I’m dually impressed……………….
From Sunday’s Televised ‘Meet the Press’. Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag. Obama Explains National Anthem Stance
Sun, 07 Sept. 2008 11:48:04 EST, General Bill Ginn’ USAF (ret.) asked Obama to explain why he doesn’t follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.
The General also stated to the Senator that according to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171… During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. At the very least, ‘Stand and Face It’ Senator Obama Live on Sunday states, ‘As I’ve said about the flag pin, I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides, Obama said. ‘There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song ‘I’d Like To Teach the World To Sing.’ If that were our anthem, then I might salute it. ‘We should consider to reinvent our National Anthem as well as to redesign our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love. It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm America to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren. If we as a Nation of warring people, should conduct ourselves as the nations of Islam, whereas peace prevails. Perhaps a state or period of mutual concord between our governments. When I become President, I will seek a pact or agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts. We as a Nation have placed upon the nations of Islam an unfair injustice. My wife disrespects the Flag for many personal reasons. Together she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past, many years ago. She has her views and I have mine’. Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put aside my hatred. I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path of hope. My wife and I look forward to becoming our Country’s First Family. Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America .
WHAAAAAAAT the Hell !!!
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, you heard it right. This could possibly be our next President. I, for one, am speechless.
Dale Lindsborg, Washington Post
You ought to be speechless, DC55, because this is a bogus claim Obama wasn’t on Meet The Press on Sept 7th. There is also no Dale Lindsborg associated with The Washington Post. Jeez, there are important reasons to reject Obama. Why make them up?