Say hello to my little friend 

                           …Anarchists discussed kidnapping delegates

I have a natural sympathy for anyone suspicious of the mechanisms and authority of The State, in any of its forms.  Conservativism and libertarianism are controlled and moderate forms of anarchism, but have nothing in common with the anarchism of, say, Mikhail Bakunin, and its deeply evil nihilism and automatic violence. 

Conservativism and libertarianism also have nothing in common with the (mostly)  young,  white, indulged, addled,  middle and upper-middle class slabs of human refuse who call themselves “anarchists” today.  They’re criminals.  Period.  And they’re part of the American Left.  Read the ordered list in the link about what they intended to do, and remember your rights as a free American.

No tags for this post.

September 3, 2008 at 4:08 pm | Trackback

20 comments

1 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.03.08 at 5:30 pm } 

.22 WMR RNL, the good old AT&T round, reaches right out and touches someone. Sorts out those types with no way to trace anything back. Distortion and fragmentation on impact and very quiet. Produces a bit of excitement in their ranks, say wot?

Either this type of activity is stopped, or this type of activity will be abruptly stopped. The day is coming.

2 Hotspur { 09.03.08 at 7:11 pm } 

Maybe the normal rules of law enforcement can regulate this vermin, but I doubt it.

3 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.04.08 at 6:11 am } 

It hasn’t yet.

4 Lazarus Long { 09.04.08 at 8:52 am } 

VT Woodchuck: what means “AT&T” round?

5 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.04.08 at 12:56 pm } 

The old ad for AT&T phones, reach out and touch someone.

6 Ed Flinn { 09.04.08 at 1:27 pm } 

It mentions “caltrops (devices used to puncture tires).” Depending on size, caltrops can also be used to disable police horses, which anarchists have a special fear of.

7 Rhod { 09.04.08 at 2:10 pm } 

“…police horses, which anarchists have a special fear of.”

Considering their methods and means, they’re chickensh*t to start with. I knew a few who described themselves as anarchists way back in the nasty late ’60’s. Mama’s boys with impulse control problems.

8 Bryan { 09.04.08 at 2:42 pm } 

Considering that these anarchomarxoids have an inordinate fear of horses, perhaps we could have a big roundup of all these pinkos and subject them all to a massed mounted cavalry charge by angry men shouting DEATH! at the top of their lungs, wielding swords, spears, axes and other implements of death.

9 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.04.08 at 4:21 pm } 

These pugnacious warriors of the feckless left only attack unarmed individuals or ranks of protectors constrained by insipid laws foisted on them by the left’s political arm.
Chants would cease filling the air and they would commence filling their pants as they waddled away in fear of the approaching mayhem delivered by unrestrained citizenry.

One only needs to have smelled a field of battle once to know of which I speak.

10 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.04.08 at 4:35 pm } 

One other item, perhaps some of you might remember seeing the Chicago Police removed their badges and wade into the protesters with truncheons. The “anarchist warriors” didn’t stand their ground then. Off they went crying to the ACLU about their civil right to loot and burn without being bludgeoned into the ground was taken away.

Do remember how terrible the press thought that it was?

I was just back from Nam, saw this show on TV. Rather enjoyed it as a new bit of reality TV, where those that spat on me got their asses kicked by someone other than me.

My hands hurt from hitting those turkeys that were calling me names, although I did damage a few.

11 Rhod { 09.04.08 at 6:41 pm } 

Solution. Get drunk at San Fran airport and have some fun. I ran into a few of them there, and I had to chastise them like a zoo keeper scolding a clan of monkeys. They didn’t understand, predictably.

12 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.04.08 at 7:20 pm } 

Did that too Rhod. Still have part of somebody’s body.

13 Rhod { 09.04.08 at 8:13 pm } 

It must be pretty funky by now, VW…..

14 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.05.08 at 10:24 am } 

A front tooth, not his d***! I could have been court-martialed for that except for a SF cop who charged the clown with biting me on the knuckle. A creative use of the law, no? Oh yeah, he was an E-5 combat MP that served somewhere down south in ‘66.
The look down favorable on the just.

15 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.05.08 at 3:09 pm } 

Lets try that again, The Gods look down favorable on the just.

16 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.05.08 at 3:33 pm } 

Back to the subject at hand. Dismounted individuals should have a fear of mounted constabulary. A trained horse in attack will stay in line, shoulder aside all in front, kick and or bite resistors, and ride over fallen opponents. Gotta like the odds in the horses favor. Trained horsemen will not let anyone get inside the horse’s head where they can inflect damage on the animal. New shoeing protects the hooves from the caltrops, which would cripple horses in a charge. The pure shock of a charge against an infantry line allowed the following foot troops to put to rout disorganized enemy.

Make great TV would it not?

One more thing for you non farm people-a horse bite can sever a heel or toe area, fingers or half a hand. We are not talking something superficial like a dog bite.

17 Hotspur { 09.05.08 at 3:49 pm } 

One theory about Waterloo, and why it was lost, holds that, in the third phase of the battle, a premature and disordered charge was begun by equine behavior rather than command orders.

The right of the line horses were on a slight grade, and several of them moved in unison to gain their footing, causing all the others to follow across the battle line. They all took off toward the British battle squares, which was not what was intended, and most of them were killed in a chaotic frontal charge.

By that time, the French treatment of their horses was so awful that the supply was already depleted, and there were no more animals to fill the ranks of the cavalry.

18 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.05.08 at 4:52 pm } 

So true, like any set piece battle, coordination is the key, which is the first thing that goes to hell in battle. They don’t call it the fog of war for the hell of it.

19 Bryan { 09.05.08 at 8:09 pm } 

“The pure shock of a charge against an infantry line allowed the following foot troops to put to rout disorganized enemy.

Make great TV would it not?”

It made a great spectacle in “The Return of the King.”

20 Vermont Woodchuck { 09.06.08 at 8:57 am } 

Graphic depiction, Bryan. For more illustration, examine Southern cavalry usage during the War of Northern Aggression.