Mass. Moonbats Learn Nothing
Nobody I know likes Deval Patrick, but his twin brother Barack Obama leads McCain by 13 points in the Bay State. So if a conservative is a liberal who has been mugged, I guess that means a moonbat is a liberal who likes being mugged.
Archived in: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Deval Patrick, John McCain, Presidential PoliticsJune 6, 2008 at 9:51 pm | Trackback
39 comments
Bush-McCain ……..”OK”….just ask them!
Patrick-Obama …….”Not OK”…just ask them!
Why, even liberals should know the Lib-Speak Equilivancy-Dance wears two shoes!
These days, the only thing rarer than a day in June is a conservative in Massachusetts. Nationally, conservatives and independents need to be aware of this Boston/Chicago experiment brought to you courtesy of the Massachusetts Institute of Cloning for Social Justice.
Fool us once, shame on them…fool us twice, shame on us!
I’m just guessing, but the Obamanites in MA are probably ’60’s and ’70’s liberals, and those twenty or so years younger. If Obama wins, the old libs will then be cadging their health, real estate security and time-share income from the young; while the young grow poorer but apparently happier in the Massachusetts dystopia created by the old left. That might be what it’s all about. Retiring Boomers calculating ways to pick the pockets of the producers.
MA, like other NE states is losing the 24-39 age group in droves, for obvious reasons. Nice state, but no future there. Liberalism is a kind of economic cannibalism. The only thing more apt than an old socialist liberal to eat its young is a carp.
An Obamasiah-Lawn Gnome ticket would give the moonbats estatic fits.
I agree with your analysis of the Barry supporters in Massachusettstan, but don’t forget the Trustifarians (Wealthy and not-so-wealthy), Leftover Lefties from the 60’s and early 70’s, the Bruthas, and the usual crowd of college stupids.
And my wife wants to go back to that craphole and live.
The old money in MA, VT etc. was tied up in farmland and business. Not a mobile bank account, one is counting on retirement to collect savings from years of work.
Trustfunders on the other hand have money and mobility. Pinch them hard and they leave, taking the tax base with them.
Are you going to nail their feet to the floor like a pate goose?
It’s amazing to me how anyone over the age of six can accept the financial lunacy of liberalism. Once you’ve had a paper route with non-paying customers, and the route manager insists that you keep delivering to the non-payers for another month, then another, you understand the injustices of redistributionism. Maybe Raul has a better explanation. I think he’s young, and appreciate his SS contributions. When I start to collect, I’ll have more income for conservative causes. Thanks, Raul.
And then there’s the booming Bush economy! Talk about “redistribution”! Corporate welfare, no-bid contracts for cronies and MORE! Thanks, Dubya! And congrats on your approval rating, too!
You’re clearly not up to the discussion. Observe the Obama voter. It’s pretty frightening.
Given his propensity to falling back on the standard gimcrack prog slogans, I’d suspect that Raul is a college stupid at one of the many higher institutions of lower learning masquerading as American universities these days.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/f.....index.html
Salon? Now THERE’s a source!
Why not? Look at your links! All right-wing fringe; Hugh F****** Hewitt? Michelle Malkin? C’mon, son! Salon isn’t a Limbo mouthpiece. But all your links sure as hell are.
Here’s the difference. YOU are a commenter on THIS blog, and this blog belongs to others. So far you’ve contributed nothing, chiefly because you’re a steaming simpleton, but also because you’re unable to restate any idea in your own words, or contribute worthy comment about any of the subjects discussed here. If you had reformulated the Salon piece, or added its content in a new or constructive way, it would have had context and could have provoked discussion.
So far you haven’t risen above the troll genus, and yours is a particularly stupid variety at that. You’re wearing out your welcome in my posts, where I have the ability to delete your crap. You’re welcome here as a matter of principle, because we’ve had liberals/progressives who (a) know something about the political origins of their ideology and are willing to argue them, (b) no political viewpoint is beneath consideration, and (c) almost everything is worth a platform. ALMOST everything.
If you’re capable of contributing something worthwhile, get to it. Otherwise, where I have the capability, you’r gone.
Hey Hotspur: the blog sucks. Delete me if you’d like, Junior. You sound like you have anger issues; are you related to Dick Cheney?
WOW! This guy’s fuse is about as long as his penis.
Hey Cheshire Cat: does Dane Cook write your juvenile material?
Raul, that was an improper use of a colon. Obviously, you are a product of public education. It shows.
Improper use of a colon?
Yes, a colon is inserted into a sentence only when a list of at least one item follows. A comma suffices in this situation.
Oh, THAT kind of colon.
Reread “The Elements of Style”.
Ohh, he has a Strunk/White. Amazing.
Do you have a Fowler’s too, Raul?
Raul, punctuation goes inside the quotation marks.
Not only that, his colon after “Hey Hotspur” followed a salutation, not a list of particulars or an elaboration - which is the Strunk recommendation that Raul name-drops to demonstrate his gigantic literary knowledge. Again, reading comprehension. His shortcomings in that department were obvious from the start.
Uh oh, Suzie….I mean Raul, will catch this instantly. Correcting my previous comment…his colon FOLLOWED a salutation rather than PRECEDE a list of particulars, etc.
He should stick with the AP style book. He’ll fit in with the other idiots that way.
Punctuation doesn’t go “inside the quotation marks” when citing documentary evidence such as a book title.
Is this the nerd club? Perhaps The Nerd Club? Maybe “The Nerd Club”?
Preening again, Suzie?
No, you lag far behind the nerds here. I await your retort on the subject of colons, and the ruling in “The Elements of Style”. When you pull a copy from your pinafore and start waving it like a phallus at your Lefty Book Club, you should know what you’re talking about.
You’re unimpressive, Suzie.
Raul, that is a style book choice, Chicago I think, and not used any more. It is not a correct grammar choice.
No nerd club here, this is the Neo-grammarians for Redefeating Tancredo.
Hotspur, what did I say about style book users.
One thing is that they affect Mediterranean/Latino names, like “Raul” - probably after Br’er Castro . This one called himself Jim and Bill for a while, too, when he was in a proletarian mood.
I can see him now, in his black beret and turtleneck, doing a public reading from Umberto Eco to a rapt crowd of carrot-juice addicts.
Dear Helen Hotspur:
Your writing is as awkward as the logic exhibited on this site. You strike me as a Dennis Miller fan. Another poor, unfunny ninny.
And I didn’t think Vermonters were as racist or sexist as the posters here.
Calling me “Suzie”, Hotspur? Is that supposed to intimidate me? Is it supposed to make me quake?
It really just makes you look like a drooling idiot.
You don’t represent that beautiful state well, but you must make your fellow fringe freaks quite happy.
And “The Elements of Style” is as relevant today, Woodchuck, as it was when first published. Those rules haven’t changed.
You guys need to get laid.
There must be some cattle nearby to help you with that.
The term for you Raul is feckless. You exhibit very unoriginal and peevish behavior expressed by attacking the person not the argument.
You challenge other’s writings yet you have written nothing fronting any principle espoused by you. Hanging out the Salon link is not presenting an argument. Parroting their line makes you a myrmidon, one of the unwashed with apparently no voice or thought of one’s own.
Your last comment establishes that of which I allude.
Hotspur skulks away in shame.
You are being called Suzie, Raul, because you chose to call me “Junior” and “son”. In your world, reviling your opponent for responding in kind is called Reason. But it’s a variation on tuo quoque, which, when I mentioned it earlier, you called my “reaching vocab affectations”. No, Suzie, it’s called a fallacy, and to this point, you’ve been a Dumpster of fallacies, anger, stereotypes, foolishess, self-regard and prejudice. We’ve had wise, intelligent and decent liberals here, but you’re on the left side of that evolutionary chart. You’re annoyed because we simply pointed up WHO you are.
You dropped the Strunk/White reference here believing that we would melt in your white hot erudition. My guess is, you’re a minor, thin-lipped, public-school pedagogue with ambitions to be a writer. First, you lack the flexibility and imagination to compose bottle labels, so give it up. I might ask you if you’ve “reread “The Elements of Style”" yourself; you haven’t corected your own mistaken certainty about the use of the colon. No matter.
I knew this moment would come, when you’d lose all control and resort to the kind of vileness that spun your tiny little motor in your first comments. I’d already decided not to fritter away any more time on a tenth-rate reactionary prog like you, and wondered what I would say when the time came to part. Well, when you work out your destiny, and arrive at the enterprise that best suits your intelligence, remember this:
Spray starch is lousy for synthetics.
Oh, one more thing, Raaaaooooollllll….
You’re a Hannity fan. Admit it. You also listen to Limbaugh so you can clench your fist and pretend to be a mensch.
Now you’re off on some demented rant about Dennis Miller.
Popular culture seems to be your natural milieu. No surprise there.
Do you guys all share a barn somewhere?
Raul, give it up. You can’t play with the big boys. Now go home and have some mint tea.
Oh yeah, Raul. What happened to Bill and Jim? Their comments came from you. Same barn?
Who are the “big boys”? You? Woodchip? “Big boys”?
That’s rich.
It’s time for you to move on, Raul. You’re obsessive and even stalking us now. Have the last word and go back to listening to talk radio, or dreaming of being a writer. I have nothing more to say to you.