The race problems next time
About thirty years ago, racial matters in America ran into the realities of The Great Society, and we’re still hiding the damage. Before then, during the Civil Rights years of the 1960’s , all of us (except black and white radicals), believed that white culture was the standard model for America. Black culture was the outlier, a state of suspension; the perverse symmetry of institutionalized segregation showed a legitimate white ethos and an imitation black version.
We thought that integration and enforced legal equality would harmonize us as a nation, settle our differences over time, and locate us in a human family, the members of which had the same ambitions and needs. It was also true, then, that black divorce rates were lower than those of whites, black business ownership was higher per capita than among whites, serious crime rates showed no population differential, school graduation rates were equivalent across the races. So if blacks needed anything from whites, it was probably something other than what they got.
If anything, black culture in integrated America was a success story. It was true that officially-measured poverty rates were much higher among blacks than whites, and this measurement always simplifies the thinking of government materialists. To them, all life can be reduced to economics. If you just raise incomes and opportunity, all the other matters will take care of themselves. One problem for blacks in the 1960’s was that white cultural elites were rejecting bourgeois prosperity and aspirations at the moment the same elites were inviting them to join up.
And then Romantic Liberalism showed up to make things worse. What the demographic data reliably showed then about black Americans, apart from the raw numbers, was an enormous pool of courage and determination to transcend the conditions imposed upon them by historical, habitual, and legal separatism. But this genuine nobility suffered the fate of all virtues that can be specialized and attributed to groups, which is one thing liberalism is most certainly about. Group identity. Black courage was romanticized by the effete mobs that clambor for myths to decorate the plain old facts of life. And once you shine the public spotlight on someone, something, anything, whatever virtue is isolated and magnified, begins to rot.
Like the earthiness attributed to truckers, the wildness attributed to Scotsmen, the eye-sparkle, melancholy and quick ironies attributed to the Irish…all the crap and flummery that Americans grope for as description and justification for differences ends up in stereotype and excuses. This is one of the first and most poisonous effects of multiculturalism; it “celebrates” distinctions because they exist, and has no moral mechanism to evaluate destructive and retrograde behavior. For this reason, we Americans are unable to even discuss the cultural divide and achievement gaps between white and black America.
All of us, black and white, have known for thirty years that something racial has gone seriously wrong in this country. Conservatives have, for years, been inviting a discussion of it, but the identity politics of the Democratic Party have bowdlerized the subject from its own liturgies, and condemned the heretics outside the party for questioning its racial orthodoxy. Curiously enough, the vapid and opportunistic Barack Obama has changed all this, and not by design.
Archived in: Barack Obama, ConservativesFebruary 25, 2008 at 7:22 pm | Trackback












8 comments
“And once you shine the public spotlight on someone, something, anything, whatever virtue is isolated and magnified, begins to rot. ”
The content of one’s character eventually meeting with the contents of one’s conscience leads to peace and justice as judged by everyone’s jury of one.
The empowered self-governed know the embarrassment and outrage of OJ justice and the peace of having reconciled their own individual consciences, whether black or white.
Helen, the OJ case revealed what blacks and many whites already believed - two standards of justice for whites and blacks, judged by the number of blacks per capita in the penal system. Just a few years ago, nearly one in four blacks under the age of 24 were either in prison, on paroll or awaiting trial. I don’t know if those numbers have changed, nor can I recall the source of the statistics.
There’s some evidence that minor drug crimes are more likely to put young blacks in jail than young whites. I know, in this CT River Valley area, it’s unusual for a white kid to be jailed for possession, even when the quantity is enough to suggest peddling.
Around here class rules rather than race, but they usually go together.
Legal manipulations which vindicate can’t vindicate a truthfully guilty perpetrator’s acknowledged or denied (colorless) conscience.
Ah, not to find fault, but OJ might not have a conscience. But good point, nevertheless.
Race In America…
If you’re interested in the topic of black and white in America and love good writing, go read this …
“Around here class rules rather than race, but they usually go together.”
Just what is the use of having money if you can’t buy a judge or two when necessary.
I think this was said by Quincy Purvis Foggcutter, a wardheeler and political hack aka “QP.” Anyway, it sounds like something they’d say.
Judges are a dime a dozen in Connecticut. It takes at least a dozen of them to figure out which end of the gavel makes noise.
Speaking of judges, I think they still wear wigs and capes and scarlet robes in England; they wear simple black robes in this country because understating fraudulence and pretension is more tasteful.
QP? Kewpie? Cue Pea? Q Pee? Versatile.