Coming soon “House of Minnow” sushi bar 

Everything ’splains something

Tests find hazardous levels of mercury in tuna sushi in New York

NEW YORK: Recent laboratory tests performed for The New York Times found so much mercury in tuna sushi that a regular diet of even two or three pieces a week at some restaurants could be a health hazard for the average adult, based on guidelines set out by the Environmental Protection Agency. [snip]

Scientists who performed the analysis for The New York Times said they had been “frankly surprised” at the results and had run the tests several times to be sure there was no mistake in the levels of methylmercury, a form of mercury tied to health problems. [snip]

Studies have found high blood mercury levels among people eating a diet rich in seafood. According to a 2007 survey by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the average level of mercury in New Yorkers’ blood is three times as high as the national average. [snip]

Methylmercury is formed from inorganic mercury by the action of anaerobic organisms that live in aquatic systems including lakes, rivers, wetlands, sediments, soils and the open ocean.

Here’s an explanation. About 4 to 5 days after the Big Bang, methylmercury went looking for fish. Success in this endeavor occurred as soon as there were fish but well before the Parable of the Loaves and Fishes.
Historians point to this occurrence as the birth of liberalism via the mercury mind melts. Earth Day, sushi houses, latte clubs, fern bars, and aromatherapy followed immediately keeping the methylmercury at requisite concentrations.

Many experts believe the government’s warnings on mercury in seafood do not go far enough. “The current advice from the FDA is insufficient,” said Dr. Philippe Grandjean, adjunct professor of environmental health at the Harvard School of Public Health and head of the Department of Environmental Medicine at the University of Southern Denmark. “In order to maintain reasonably low mercury exposure you have to eat fish low in the food chain, the smaller fish, and they are not saying that.”

Naturally, the barking moonbats tossed in their two slugs.

Some environmental groups have already sounded the alarm. Environmental Defense, the advocacy group, says no one should eat bluefin tuna. [snip]

Archived in: , , , ,

January 23, 2008 at 8:46 pm | Trackback

6 comments

1 Rhod { 01.24.08 at 5:11 am } 

House of Minnow? Ever try to fillet one of those little devils?

Kerry’s at fault. Heinz does, or did, own Chicken of the Sea. And yet another reason to avoid Manhattan.

2 Vermont Woodchuck { 01.24.08 at 8:35 am } 

I love doing this.
Minnow-family Cyprinidae- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnow
Mahseers-http://www.geocities.com/yosemite/5112/mahseer.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyprinidae
All minnows

3 Don L { 01.24.08 at 11:45 am } 

I recall when Vt announced the discovery of mercury in Lake Champlain’s walleye population. My wife and I had just taken a nice mess of fish and enjoyed them anyway. many decades later, I am still fihing and eating Lake Champlain walleye and perch. I do think they improved my longevity..

4 Rhod { 01.24.08 at 1:20 pm } 

Comsuming Mercury is a whole lot safer than driving a Mercury, Don.

5 Lauren Guite { 01.25.08 at 4:41 pm } 

Thanks for this important post! I just wanted to add that Environmental Defense has done all the research you’ll need to make fish choices that are good for you and the ocean. We took into account fishing and farming methods as well as mercury and PCB advisories from the EPA. You can find our seafood selector at http://EnvironmentalDefense.org/Seafood.

Don’t forget to print out the handy pocket version so you’ll always be ready to make eco-friendly fish choices!

Lauren Guite
Environmental Defense

6 Hotspur { 01.25.08 at 4:47 pm } 

The single Arthur Treacher’s and the three remaining Red Lobsters need to be notified, Lauren. We shall forward the seafood selector to the appropriate peg-leg captains at all of these companies. Thanks so much.